Thomas Hobbes Philosophical Political Piece - 1317 Words

Thomas Hobbe s philosophical political piece The Leviathan argues that society functions most effectively if all state and commonwealth is delegated by an all powerful sovereign, and that without it we are in a state of chaos, otherwise titled by Hobbes as the state of nature (Thomas Hobbes, 2002, p. 181). I will argue that it is not possible to acknowledge what life is like in the state of nature without fully acknowledging that life in the state of nature leads to an all-powerful sovereign that ultimately leads to the benefit of the people due to humanity s innate fear of death and desire for civilization. To elaborate, in humanity s most primal state of being, stripped away from all states of authority and government, civilization is in a state of aggressive disarray that is nasty, brutish, and short (Thomas Hobbes, 2002, p. 181). Without the Leviathan, we as humans are primal, aggressive, chaotic, and uncivilized. As a result of this innate reaction of pandemonium in abse nce of an appointed authority, in order to function effectively as members of society we run into the arms of an all-powerful sovereign, which cannot be challenged and therefore has limitless power (Thomas Hobbes, 2002, p. 180, p. 181). It is important to note the Hobbes Leviathan assumes that humans have a biological yearn to be civilized, and a biological yearn to fear death, being the two drives we have to seek civilized refuge in the all-powerful sovereign. Therefore, given theShow MoreRelatedCompare Aristotle’s Claim That Man Is a ‘Political Animal’ with Hobbe’s Claim That the State of Nature Is a State of War.1973 Words   |  8 PagesCompare Aristotle’s Claim that Man is a ‘Political Animal’ with Hobbe’s Claim that the State of Nature is a State of War. Noah Park Ever since the existence of a civilization, the fundamental question of how and why; to identify and explain the human’s nature and how man is ought to live, has been the key element in philosophical world. Many philosophers provided and made public of how they viewed this world as, and the human in it, and experimented themselves with their approaches, however